![]() However, being open source means anyone can get their hands on it, so it doesn’t stop the wrong people grabbing the software, nor does it stop anyone from misusing it.” Does Meta have safeguards in place? “You can issue licence terms on the software that, if abused, could make the abusing company liable under various forms of legal redress. You can regulate the repositories, like Github or Hugging Face, under local legislation,” he said. “It’s a bit like giving people a template to build a nuclear bomb,” she said.ĭr Andrew Rogoyski, of the Institute for People-Centred AI at the University of Surrey, said open-source models were difficult to regulate. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.ĭame Wendy Hall, regius professor of computer science at the University of Southampton, told the Today programme there were questions over whether the tech industry could be trusted to self-regulate LLMs, with the problem looming even larger for open-source models. For more information see our Privacy Policy. Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. Open-sourcing makes a powerful tool in this technology available to all. Tech professionals including Elon Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI, have expressed concerns about an AI arms race. The LLM is available for download via the Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Hugging Face platforms. Microsoft is a key financial backer of OpenAI but is nonetheless supporting the launch of Llama 2. ![]() Meta has admitted in research published alongside Llama 2 that it “lags behind” GPT-4, but it is a free competitor to OpenAI nonetheless. There is also a possibility that by giving all comers the chance to launch a rival to ChatGPT, Bard or Microsoft’s Bing chatbot, Meta is potentially diluting the competitive edge of tech peers such as Google. ![]() “With the … wisdom of crowds you actually make these systems safer and better and, crucially, you take them out of the … clammy hands of the big tech companies which currently are the only companies that have either the computing power or the vast reservoirs of data to build these models in the first place.” Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Wednesday that making LLMs open-source would make them “safer and better” by inviting outside scrutiny. The idea is that startups or established businesses can access Llama 2 models and tinker with them to create their own products including, potentially, rivals to ChatGPT or Google’s Bard chatbot – although by Meta’s own admission Llama 2 is not quite at the level of GPT-4, the LLM behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Llama 2 is being released in three versions, including one that can be built into an AI chatbot. If an LLM is made open-source that means its content is made freely available for people to access, use and tweak to their own purpose. They are trained on vast datasets that enable them to mimic human language and even computer coding. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |